Labels
Popular Posts
Contributors
Followers
Search This Blog
Twitter Updates
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Song of the Week #9: "Lotus Flower" and "If I lose You"
Hello friends. It’s been a while, I know. But I have returned with a song of the week! So fear not! This week I’d like to feature two brand new songs from two of my favorite artists. The first being a brand new single from Radiohead!!! This comes from their new album “The King of Limbs” which was just released today. You can download it from www.radiohead.com . The video itself is very odd. It features Thom Yorke dancing abstractly to the music. Enjoy it!
The second video comes from the band Shiny Toy Guns. This is the first track in a few years that features the reunion of the band and their former lead singer, Carah Faye Charnow. We all wait with baited breathe for the new album, hopefully due out later this year.
Thanks for listening,
Matt
Friday, February 4, 2011
Song of the Week #8: The Becoming
This week I'd like to feature a great live studio recording of "The Becoming" as performed by Nine Inch Nails. I've always enjoyed the energy Reznor puts into this specific performance.
ok ok, one more. This ones for you love.
Video of the Week 6: Stanley Kubrick
Monday, January 17, 2011
Song of the Week: honourable mention
During my travels with the internet peoples, I stumbled upon this little gem.
Jurassic Park Theme (1000% Slower) by birdfeeder
And here is the download link if you enjoy it enough!
http://www.mediafire.com/?51fhcm5lejdwfhh
thanks for listening,
Matt Gallagher
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Song of the Week 8: And All That Could Have Been
uploaded by: orangepeelpro
Another great tune that fits within the same general mood is The great Below. Another personal favourite. Ive always felt these two go nicely hand in hand. This particular track comes from the album The Fragile. This particular video is taken from a live performance from the Fragility 2.0 tour in 2000. it opens with La Mer then concludes with The Great Below.
uploaded by: nemesiswontdie
Friday, January 7, 2011
Song of the Week #7: Packt like Sardines in a Crushd tin Box
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Video of the Week #3: Batman and the Joker
Friday, December 10, 2010
Song of the Week #3: Faunts - Meno Mony Falls
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
The Death of the Working Class Hero
Friday, November 26, 2010
Song of the Week #1: Gust Of... by The Album Leaf
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Response to: Shaping Our Identity


Sunday, October 24, 2010
Friday, October 22, 2010
Computations within the cloud
By:
Matt Gallagher
I very much like the concept posed towards the end. Subconscious connection of masses. Cloud computing if you will. Minds conjoined to sew the very fabrics of time. An evolution of the sub conscious over time to protect itself. This allows for the assumption that you and I and they exist and our interactions are not falsified, just simulated. Maybe our physical manifestation is nothing more than a subconscious portrayal of what we used to be. A portrayal of a body that now ceases to exist. If our current state of mind allows us to virtualize existence as we know it and manifest it as a dream, then an evolved mind could potentially live fully immersed in the virtualization or dream world.
how do i know my existence is real?
By:
Matt Gallagher
I made a mistake last night. My intentions were noble as I downed two energy drinks as the clock struck 9 pm. My goal: to achieve alertness during my evening class. This did not work. To my dismay, the effects kicked in some time around midnight, keeping me wide eyed until the morning; or so i thought.
One might pose the possibility that I am currently asleep. My perception of reality is no longer valid. The world I inhabit nothing more than a vivid recreation of the subconscious. Maybe my reality is merely a dream my subconscious has created to mask the fact that I have not maintained consciousness. What indication in my current state proves my existence? My senses cannot be trusted. My memories as mentioned in previous posts cannot me trusted. I can ask the person beside me but their answer may be simply a projection of my subconscious. If all aspects of reality cannot be trusted then what may I use to wake up? I am helpless. Left to wait for my reality to break apart as a dream would, waiting for the believable to become the unbelievable. As in a dream, the projected reality is perceived as real and untainted only until the dreamscape is broken. Once the dreamer awakes, he is able to see the dream for what it is. So then whats to say the dream's flaws are only realized after the fact? Possibly the unbelievable is completely believable within the context of the dream, leaving it as close to reality as possible.
With this theory, then, my process of waiting for the unbelievable does not apply. I will only realize my reality a dream, after I awake from it.
thank you for listening,
Matt
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Re: Re: How do we come to trust our memories?
What I'm insinuating is a hypothetical world where a single creator has full control. We as the created can not rely solely on our memories to establish our relevance in the world. This is bec if our memories (and everything else) can be manipulated, then we would never know our place. A fictitious existence.
I should backtrack. You touched on us having to rely on what we have impacted, effected, or created. In my initial theory, this is all effectible and can be manipulated by the creator. It in fact manipulatable by us even. That is why memory remains the single item we are able to trust. If the creator can manipulate our memory then our existence is falsified.
Where you are taking this is interesting too. My initial thoughts, as stated above, is that there is an all powerful creator manipulating everything at a molecular level. What you are saying is that maybe it is power over only memory. Where matter cannot me manipulated. In that essence I think time would remain a constant. By simply removing or adding memory would only alter our personal recollection of the timeline we are on, not change it. My initial theory is of a manipulating timeline, through changing memory and matter. Changing our beings themselves.
If the creator has complete control then there would be no need to take memories from one and place them in another. What I'm saying is that our existence could be no more then seconds old. The creator "pops" us into existence and populates us with memories of our past lives. We would never know yet we would have a fake timeline that is so believable simply because we remember it. Using this theory, I am trying to say that the only truth that we can use to attempt to argue our existence is that of our memories. Everything else cannot be believed or trusted and in that regard neither can our memories. Our memories though, as fictitious as they may be, are the only items that prove our existence, regardless of how old we are.
Thank you for listening,
Matt


